The United States has stated that its latest round of strikes on Iran is specifically aimed at dismantling key components of the country’s security apparatus, according to remarks shared with Al Jazeera. American officials described the operation not as a symbolic show of force, but as a deliberate and structured effort to degrade Iran’s military capabilities and internal security infrastructure. The objective, they indicated, is to reduce the operational effectiveness of systems that underpin Iran’s defensive posture and regional influence.
According to U.S. sources, the scope and duration of the current strikes are expected to exceed those carried out in June 2025. That earlier round of attacks was widely viewed as limited and calibrated, designed to send a warning while avoiding broader escalation. In contrast, officials now suggest this campaign reflects a deeper and more sustained military undertaking. Rather than a short burst of targeted action, the operation appears structured in phases, potentially unfolding over multiple days and involving a wider array of military assets.
American officials have emphasized that the effort is strategic in nature. Targets reportedly include elements tied to Iran’s military command networks, weapons storage facilities, air defense systems, and security infrastructure. By focusing on structural capabilities rather than isolated positions, the campaign signals an intent to impose longer-term constraints on Iran’s ability to project force or coordinate internal security responses. The broader timeline also allows for reassessment between waves of strikes, enabling military planners to adjust objectives based on real-time intelligence and battlefield developments.
Meanwhile, developments inside Tehran suggest the immediate impact of the strikes is already being felt. Mehr News Agency reported disruptions to mobile phone services in parts of the capital, raising concerns about communications instability as tensions escalate. While the exact cause of the outages has not been fully clarified, disruptions to telecommunications infrastructure are often associated with either defensive precautionary measures or collateral effects from strikes targeting security systems. In any case, interruptions to communication networks contribute to uncertainty among the civilian population and complicate the flow of reliable information. 
